The Federal Government has been dragged to the ECOWAS Community Court of
Justice in Abuja by the Registered Trustees of the Socio-Economic
Rights and Accountability Project (SERAP) over what it described as,
“failure to prevent, account for and investigate killings, raping,
maiming of Nigerians and other residents, and destruction of property
across the country by herdsmen, the military and the police.”
In the suit No ECW/CCJ/APP/15/16 and filed yesterday by Solicitor to
SERAP, Femi Falana, SAN, the Plaintiff contends, “that the continuing
attacks, killings, raping, maiming of Nigerians and other residents, and
destruction of property by the military, police, herdsmen and other
unknown perpetrators across the country amount to serious violations of
human rights of the rights to life, to the security and dignity of the
human person, and to property.”
The suit reads in part, “The Plaintiff contends that the Defendant is
responsible for these human rights violations and abuses by the
military, police, herdsmen and other unknown perpetrators which have not
been adequately prevented, investigated or prosecuted by the
authorities.
“These responsibilities are heightened when an observable pattern has
been overlooked or ignored, such as is the case in this suit.”
“The Plaintiff also contends that the obligation to secure the right
to life is not confined to cases where it has been established that the
killings were caused by an agent of the State.
“Nor is it decisive whether those affected or their families have
lodged a formal complaint about the killings with the competent
investigatory authority.”
“It is contended that the mere knowledge of the killings by the
military, police, herdsmen and other unknown perpetrators on the part of
the authorities have ipso facto given rise to an obligation under
Article 4 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights to carry
out an effective investigation into the circumstances surrounding the
killings and to identify the perpetrators and bring them to justice, and
to provide reparations to victims.”
“Moreover, the Defendant has a responsibility for those killings,
raping maiming and destruction of property where authorities knew or
ought to have known of an immediate threat and failed to take measures
that might have been expected to avoid those attacks and killings.”
“The Plaintiff further contends that the Defendant has positive
obligations to provide a framework of security for the protection of
life, and to protect the lives of those individuals at risk from
unlawful attacks by the military, police, herdsmen and other unknown
perpetrators.
“The lack of accountability for the attacks by the military, police,
herdsmen and other unknown perpetrators across the country has continued
to create a culture of impunity which clearly is not compatible with
the rule of law in a democratic society.”
“The Plaintiff contends that the Defendant has a positive obligation
to take measures to secure the right to life, right to security and
dignity of the human person and right to property, and to prevent
attacks and killings by the military, police, herdsmen and other unknown
perpetrators across Nigeria.”
“Human life has a special value and dignity which requires legal
protection. It should be pointed out that those affected in the present
case include the most disadvantaged and vulnerable sectors of society.”
“By interpreting the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights so
as to impose on the Defendant obligations to prevent, account for and
investigate killings, raping, maiming of Nigerians and other residents
and destruction of property, whether or not the Defendant is directly or
indirectly responsible, the ECOWAS Court of Justice will be demanding
from the Nigerian government a commitment to securing these rights and
to the reform of the very structure and modus operandi of its legal
institutions.
“In so doing, the ECOWAS Court will help to address the systemic
factors contributing to the attacks by the military, police, herdsmen
and other unknown perpetrators.”
“A fundamental notion of contemporary human rights law is that
victims of violations enjoy an independent right to effective remedies.
This idea is itself founded on another longstanding legal principle: ubi
ius ibi remedium (there is no right without a remedy).”
“SERAP therefore is asking the ECOWAS Court of Justice for the
following reliefs: A DECLARATION that the attacks, killings, raping and
maiming of citizens and other residents and destruction of property and
other serious human rights violations and abuses across the country by
the military, police, herdsmen and other unknown perpetrators amount to
failure by the Defendant to exercise due diligence to prevent the
attacks and killings and cannot be justified under any circumstances,
and therefore constitutes a serious breach of Nigeria’s international
human rights obligations and commitments to ensure and secure the rights
to life, to dignity and security of the human person, and to property,
guaranteed under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, and
the UN International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which
Nigeria is a state party.
“A DECLARATION that the failure of the Defendant to exercise due
diligence and to take steps to prevent attacks, killings, raping, and
maiming of hundreds of Nigerians and other residents and destruction of
property and other serious human rights violations and abuses by the
military, police, herdsmen and other unknown perpetrators, and to
conduct prompt, impartial, thorough and transparent investigations and
to hold those responsible to account, is unlawful as it amounts to
breaches of obligations to respect, protect, promote and fulfil the
human rights guaranteed under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’
Rights and International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights to which
Nigeria is a state party.
“A DECLARATION that the failure of the Defendant to provide for an
effective remedy and reparation for the victims, is unlawful as it
amounts to breaches of obligations to respect, protect, promote and
fulfil the human rights guaranteed under the African Charter on Human
and Peoples’ Rights and International Covenant on Civil and Political
Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.
“A DECLARATION that the failure of the Defendant to provide an
environment necessary for securing and promoting the enjoyment of the
human rights to life, dignity and security of the person, and to
property, is unlawful as it amounts to breaches of obligations to
promote and fulfil the human rights guaranteed under the African Charter
on Human and Peoples’ Rights and International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights to which Nigeria is a state party.
“AN ORDER directing the Defendant and/or its agents individually
and/or collectively to respect, protect, promote, and fulfil the human
rights of Nigerians and residents and communities across the country
that have suffered attacks and human rights violations abuses by the
military, police, herdsmen and other unknown perpetrators.
“AN ORDER directing the Defendant to investigate all cases of
unlawful killings noted herein and pay adequate money compensation of
N50 million to each of the dependents.
“AN ORDER directing the Defendant and/or its agents individually
and/or collectively to provide effective remedies and reparation,
including adequate compensation, restitution, satisfaction or guarantees
of non-repetition that the Honourable Court may deem fit to grant to
the victims of attacks by the military, police, herdsmen and other
unknown perpetrators.”
No comments:
Post a Comment